|   | 
						
						The 
						ACJ and battles over Zionism inside Jewish social 
						welfare organizations (Video
						YouTube, Audio
						MP3)
						by Allan Brownfeld 
						is a 
						syndicated columnist, associate editor of The Lincoln 
						Review and the editor of Issues, the quarterly journal 
						of the American Council for Judaism. He is a 
						contributing editor to The Washington Report on Middle
						 
						East Affairs. Brownfeld served on the faculties of St. Stephen's 
						Episcopal School, Alexandria, Virginia, and the 
						University College of the University of Maryland. Mr. 
						Brownfeld has written for such newspapers as 
						The Houston Press, The Richmond Times Dispatch, The 
						Washington Evening Star, and The Cincinnati Enquirer.
						 His weekly column appeared for more than a 
						decade in  Roll Call, the 
						newspaper of Capitol Hill. His articles have
						also appeared in such journals 
						as The Yale Review, The Texas 
						Quarterly, the North American Review, Orbis and Modern 
						Age. Mr. Brownfeld served as a member of the 
						staff of the U.S. Senate Internal Security Subcommittee 
						and also served as Assistant to the Research Director of 
						the House Republican Conference. 
						
						Thank you. 
						It's a great pleasure to be here and to meet many of my 
						longtime readers in the 
						Washington Report on Middle East Affairs with which 
						I have been associated—it seems like—for decades.  
						
						Now, we all 
						know that Zionism has distorted American policy in the 
						Middle East. At the same time, it has had a terribly 
						negative impact upon Jewish life in the United States 
						and throughout the world. And it is important to 
						remember that, historically, Zionism was a minority view 
						within Judaism, particularly in America.  
						
						The 
						organization whose journal I edit, the American Council 
						for Judaism, was established in 1942 and it was 
						established primarily because the established Jewish 
						organizations, which had previously opposed the concept 
						of Jewish nationalism, had changed course. So the 
						Council was organized to maintain this older view that, 
						first, Judaism is a religion, not a nationality, that 
						American Jews are American by nationality and Jews by 
						religion, just as other people are Protestant, Catholic, 
						or Muslim. 
						
						This was the 
						view maintained by the vast majority of American Jews 
						all through history. In my opinion, it's the view of the 
						silent majority today. Zionism gained a foothold largely 
						because of the reaction to Naziism. Something had to be 
						done in the wake of the horror of Europe.  
						 
						But I just want to give you a little bit of the history 
						so you understand where we're coming from. In 1841, at 
						the dedication of Temple Beth Elohim in Charleston, 
						South Carolina, the oldest reform synagogue in America, 
						Rabbi Gustav Posnanski declared, "This country is our 
						Palestine. This city is our Jerusalem. This house of God 
						is our temple." 
						
						In 1885, 
						when the Union of American Hebrew Congregations was 
						established in Pittsburgh, Rabbi Isaac Mayer Wise, the 
						leading reform rabbi of the time, was instrumental in 
						writing what was called the "Pittsburgh Platform." In 
						it, he declared, "We consider ourselves no longer a 
						nation but a religious community and, therefore, expect 
						neither a return to Palestine, nor a sacrificial worship 
						under the sons of Aaron, nor the restoration of any laws 
						concerning the Jewish state." 
						
						One of the 
						leading Jewish theologians of the 20th century, Abraham 
						Joshua Heschel said, "Judaism is not a religion of space 
						and does not worship the soil. So true the state of 
						Israel is not the climax of Jewish history but a test of 
						the integrity of the Jewish people and the competence of 
						Judaism."  
						 
						And in 1929, a respected Orthodox rabbi, Aaron Samuel 
						Tamarat wrote that the very notion of a sovereign Jewish 
						state as a spiritual center was a contradiction to 
						Judaism's ultimate purpose. He wrote, "Judaism is not 
						some religious concentration that can be localized or 
						situated in a single territory. Neither is Judaism a 
						nationality in the sense of modern nationalism, fit to 
						be woven into the threefoldedness of homeland, army, and 
						heroic songs. No, Judaism is Torah, ethics, an 
						exaltation of the spirit. If Judaism is truly Torah, 
						then it cannot be reduced to the confines of any 
						particular territory, for as scripture said of Torah, 
						it's measure is greater than the Earth." 
						 
						It is my opinion that what has happened to American 
						Judaism has completely corrupted its religious nature. 
						What we are witnessing today, synagogues flying Israeli 
						flags, programs urging American Jews to immigrate to 
						Israel, their real homeland, is a form of idolatry, 
						making the sovereign state of Israel the object of 
						worship, rather than God. 
						
						In 1999, the 
						Union for Reformed Judaism adopted a resolution saying 
						Israel is central to our religion. Israel, not God. And 
						one of the prominent Zionists, Professor Wisse of 
						Harvard University, said at one time, "I would rather 
						surround myself with Jews who loved Israel and didn't 
						believe in God at all than with those who believed in 
						God and did not love Israel." 
						
						It is also 
						my view that Zionism is a subversive enterprise. What 
						would we, as Americans, think of any religious 
						institution in our society that flew a foreign flag in 
						its houses of worship, that told young Americans that 
						this is not really their homeland, that some place else 
						is their homeland, and that the highest form of their 
						religious expression is to immigrate to that country?
						 
						 
						Now, I doubt that very many American Jews believe any of 
						that. Very few American Jews are immigrating to Israel, 
						yet their religious institutions manifest that 
						sensibility.  
						
						If you read 
						the Jewish press, whether the 
						Forward or the 
						Washington 
						Jewish Week or local Jewish papers in Los 
						Angeles or Cleveland, you get the feeling that you are 
						reading the papers of an expatriate community. It's as 
						if you were reading the papers of recent immigrants from 
						El Salvador who are reading about the daily events in 
						their home country and were being urged to return. 
						
						Now, there 
						have been many distortions in American Jewish life. 
						Consider the hypocrisy of American Jewish organizations 
						which have gone to court to remove voluntary school 
						prayer from our schools, remove Christmas trees from our 
						schools, yet support a theocracy in Israel where there 
						is no separation of church and state. The Israel calls 
						itself a Jewish state, yet non-Orthodox Jews have fewer 
						rights in Israel than any place in the Western World. 
						Reformed rabbis have no right to perform weddings or 
						funerals. Conversions by reformed rabbis are not 
						recognized. Israel is not a free society with regard to 
						religion. 
						
						The question 
						then arises, American Jewish organizations who have 
						dedicated themselves with such fervor to a strict 
						separation of church and state seem not really to 
						believe in separation of church and state when Jews are 
						a majority. It's interesting that when Thomas Jefferson 
						and James Madison wrote the Virginia Declaration of 
						Religious Freedom, they were not members of a persecuted 
						minority. They were people who believed in religious 
						freedom. One wonders if the American Jewish 
						establishment shares that belief. 
						
						Consider how 
						Israel has infiltrated American Jewish life to the 
						extent when resolutions were proposed in Congress to 
						recognize the Armenian genocide by Turkey, Jewish 
						organizations led the crusade to remove that legislation 
						and defeat it because Israel, at that time, was allied 
						with Turkey. I suspect if the same resolution came up 
						today, these organizations might take a different, 
						different position. 
						
						In Israel 
						itself, there is a growth of racism, there is a growth 
						of religious extremism. The book The King's Torah 
						was a bestseller. This is a book that said Jews and 
						non-Jews are basically different in nature, Jews are 
						much closer to God than non-Jews, who are referred to as 
						uncompassionate.  
						 
						The Ten Commandments, thou shalt not kill, according to 
						this book, written by Orthodox rabbis whose yeshivas on 
						the occupied West Bank are financed by the Israeli 
						government, this book says that thou shalt not kill 
						refers only to one Jew killing another, not killing 
						non-Jews. In fact, it discusses the circumstances under 
						which it is all right to kill non-Jewish children, 
						religious extremism of the highest order. Rabbis have 
						made proclamations telling Jews in Israel not to rent 
						homes, apartments to non-Jews.  
						
						We 
						understand there's religious extremism in many parts of 
						the world. My point is why don't American Jews say a 
						word about this? Not a word of criticism of the racism 
						and extremism growing in Israel. It has distorted Jewish 
						values. It has distorted American Jewish life. 
						
						Now, I'm not 
						a pessimist because, as I said earlier, I believe that 
						the position I represent represents a silent majority of 
						American Jews, not those who are members of
						AIPAC or the
						American Jewish Committee. 
						But the vast majority of American Jews believe they are 
						Americans, believe that Judaism is their religion, do 
						not believe that Israel is their homeland. Zionism is in 
						retreat, in my opinion, within the Jewish community. 
						 
						We've seen a number of events. Hillel foundations in 
						various parts of the country are rejecting the 
						guidelines set down by the Hillel Foundation officially. 
						And Eric Fingerhut, the former congressman from Ohio who 
						is now the head of Hillel, said, "According to our 
						guidelines, no anti-Zionists will be permitted to speak 
						at Hillel foundations." Mr. Fingerhut must not be aware 
						of the long tradition of Jewish opposition to Zionism 
						that I have just recited.  
						
						And do you 
						know this is nothing new among the established Jewish 
						community? When Napoleon invaded Russia and Napoleon was 
						bringing religious freedom to Russia, Napoleon tore down 
						the ghetto walls all over Europe. But the rabbis in 
						Russia supported the czar and opposed Napoleon because 
						if the ghetto walls were torn down and religious freedom 
						came to Russia, the authority of the rabbis would be 
						eliminated. 
						 
						So among young people, there's a great belief in freedom 
						of speech, in freedom of debate, and a desire that moral 
						values, treating each individual with human dignity, be 
						applied everywhere: in Palestine, as well as in Israel, 
						as well as in our own country.  
						
						So I think 
						Zionism within the Jewish community is in retreat, and 
						time will tell whether I'm right. Thank you very much. 
						
						Speaker Transcripts Audio and 
						Video  | 
						
						  |